Virtual Patching is a policy for a web application firewall (in this case ModSecurity) that is able to identify attempts to exploit a specific Website vulnerability. ModSecurity analyzes transactions and intercepts attacks in transit, so malicious traffic never reaches the target Website. The end result is that even if a vulnerability still exists within the application's source code, the virtual patch will protect against clients attempting to exploit it.
Virtual Patching is an extremely valuable technique that can be used to provide immediate protection against identified vulnerabilities. The trick here, however, is that you first must identify them! You can't really create a patch if you don't know what the problem is. There are six main processes that may yield vulnerability information that you can then take action on by virtually patching them:
All of these scenarios are somewhat similar in that they all provide vulnerability information in reports of some sort. The only exception is that last one, a Security Incident. This is a unique situation in that there are no ifs, ands or buts involved in the discussions as to whether or not you need to respond to this issue. Any sort of lead time that you may have been counting on for a normal patching process, source code fix or system outage is suddenly thrown out the windows as proper Incident Response steps require you to act immediately. This is where Virtual Patching can prove to be invaluable.
In case you missed it, the United Nations (UN) website was recently defaced by a defacement trio known as "KEREM125 M0STED AND GSY." They defaced the site by adding html text to the speeches page. An archived screen shot is located here - notice the text under the "Latest speeches" window. And then here on the specific speech page.
While the details of the specific attack vector can not be 100% confirmed, it is suspected that the attackers used an SQL Injection vulnerability. A software developer named Giorgio Maone chronicled this incident on his Blog site. Maone partly deduced that SQL Injection was the likely attack vector by the missing apostrophe/single-quote in the word "dont" in the defacement text. Single-quotes are normally a key component of creating proper SQL query syntax and it is assumed that attempting to include it in the text would have complicated the SQL Injection attack. Maone also showed that the "statID" parameter for the statments_full.asp page is the most likely candidate for the attack as this URL – "http://www.un.org/apps/news/infocus/sgspeeches/statments_full.asp?statID=105'" – reveals the following DB error message:
ADODB.Recordset.1 error '80004005' SQLState: 37000 Native Error Code: 8180 SQLState: 37000 Native Error Code: 105 [MERANT][ODBC SQL Server Driver][SQL Server]Unclosed quotation mark before the character string ''. [MERANT][ODBC SQL Server Driver][SQL Server]Statement(s) could not be prepared. /apps/news/infocus/sgspeeches/statments_full.asp, line 26
Once the defacement was identified, the main UN site was taken offline and the following message was presented to clients:
This site will be temporarily unavailable due to scheduled maintenance.
After a number of hours, the site came back online. Unfortunately, vulnerability had not been patched as the same error message could be generated. It seemed that there was some sort of basic filter in place that attempted to filter out the single-quote character, however this is not a sufficient fix as there are SQL Injection queries that do not rely on this character. There is also the possibility of bypassing this filter by using the char() function. A short time later, the entire site was offline and presented clients with this message:
The UN website is undergoing urgent maintenance and is currently unavailable. Please check back in a short while.
When the site did come back online the Speeches section was not available and the same old vulnerability was still present...
We can only speculate at this point as to what was happening behind closed doors in the UN Incident Response team meetings, however they obviously had difficulty with addressing the standard "Eradication Phase" of the issue. When the choice is either being totally offline while waiting for the source code to be fixed vs. putting the site back online and monitoring the logs more closely for issues, the latter will always win out.
Looking at the URL again, we can narrow down the issue to the statments_full.asp application and specifically to the statID parameter. Looking at the normal, expected values associated with the statID parameter you can see that the data should only be digits. The following ModSecurity Virtual Patch could have been used to fix this issue by implementing a positive security ruleset:
<Location /apps/news/infocus/sgspeeches/statments_full.asp> SecRule &ARGS "!@eq 1" SecRule ARGS_NAMES "!^statid$" SecRule ARGS:statID "!^\d{1,3}$" </Location>
This rule uses the normal Apache Location directive as a container for the ModSecurity rules. Inside this location, we are enforcing the following three rules:
If this rule were in place, the example URL provided above would have been denied with this alert message:
[Wed Jun 13 01:06:37 2007] [error] [client 192.168.15.1] ModSecurity: Access denied with code 403 (phase 2). Match of "rx ^\\\\d{1,3}$" against "ARGS:statID" required. [file "/usr/local/apache/conf/rules/modsecurity_crs_15_customrules.conf"] [line "4"] [hostname "www.un.org"] [uri "/apps/news/infocus/sgspeeches/statments_full.asp?statID=105'"] [unique_id "lCFILsCoD4QAABWcDp4AAAAD"]
This Virtual Patch would have provided instant protection against this issue until the actual source code could have been update or fixed.