Contrary to popular belief, deepfakes — AI-crafted audio files, images, or videos that depict events and statements that never occurred; a portmanteau of “deep learning” and “fake” — are not all intrinsically malicious.
These pieces of synthetic media can be used to create immersive and realistic learning experiences, democratize visual effects and filmmaking technologies, and help train employees on negotiations and high-stakes communications.
However, most of the news surrounding deepfakes feature its dangers, and understandably so. This revolutionary technology can be weaponized for phishing, business email compromise (BEC) attacks and even nonconsensual deepfake pornography. The fact that deepfake technology can be abused to spread misinformation should also be heavily underscored, especially during the election cycle.
Let’s take a look at the state of deepfakes during the 2020 elections, how it’s currently making waves in the 2024 election cycle, and how voters can tell truth from digital deception.
In 2018, deepfake technology started becoming more mainstream, with Jordan Peele’s deepfake video of the former US President Barack Obama going viral to warn voters against fake news.
Now, deepfakes are even more powerful and can enable fake news to a higher degree than during the 2018 elections and can make voters believe that candidates said something they didn’t say or do, which can destroy their credibility. However, during the 2020 election cycle, the threat of deepfake disinformation was far greater than the actual weaponization of the technology for misinformation.
Reports state that during that time, more simple or traditional methods of disinformation proved to still be effective and more easily accessible. One such example is the edited video of Nancy Pelosi that was digitally slowed down to show her as drunk and incoherent.
Despite deepfake technology being in its early stages in 2020, alarm bells started ringing for the potential of this technology to be misused for malicious purposes.
It didn’t take long for deepfake technology to become more advanced and accessible, making the abuse of deepfake technology in influence operations more widespread, impactful, and potentially dangerous.
In January 2024, a deepfake audio of President Joe Biden was used in robocalls that discouraged voters in New Hampshire from voting during the state’s primary elections. It was reported that Steve Kramer, a political consultant, was behind the deepfake. Kramer was indicted in New Hampshire and fined US$6 million by the Federal Communications Commission (FCC). In August, the FCC also penalized Lingo Telecom, a voice service provider that played a role in distributing the deepfake voice of President Biden, with a US$1 million fine.
Three months before the 2024 presidential elections, Republican presidential nominee Donald Trump shared AI-altered images of Taylor Swift fans appearing to wear “Swifties for Trump” shirts. Creating deepfake images of Taylor Swift, who held the highest-grossing concert tour of all time in 2023, endorsing a presidential candidate can potentially deceive voters into thinking that the artist’s large fanbase supports the Republican candidate. Although Trump later admitted that the images were fake and that AI can be dangerous, he was seen repetitively resharing AI-generated content created by his supporters.
Tesla CEO and X (formerly Twitter) Chairman Elon Musk also shared a fake campaign video featuring a deepfake audio of Kamala Harris saying untrue things on X, including her being a diversity hire and not knowing the first thing about running a country. The tech mogul, who has publicly endorsed Trump, didn’t outrightly state that the video was a parody at first, but after a couple of days, shared that the video was intended as satire.
Because these AI-generated videos get massive reach and engagement on social media, it has ignited discussions on whether these kinds of synthetic content should be treated as harmless satire or dangerous disinformation.
Since the advent of new generative AI tools, anyone can easily craft political deepfakes. A report from Google’s DeepMind shows that AI tools are being used to create deepfakes of politicians and celebrities to shape public opinion more than it’s being used to aid cybercrime.
New research from the Center for Countering Digital Hate (CCDH) also found that Musk’s new generative AI tool, Grok, had safety failures that allowed users to create deepfake images to spread political misinformation. Researchers observed that Grok did not reject 60 text prompts related to disinformation surrounding the 2024 presidential election.
Recently, the AI platform was also tweaked after election officials from five states called out the platform for producing false information about state ballot deadlines.
While laws aiming to prohibit individuals from using AI for nonconsensual impersonation and regulate deepfake creation for election-related communications are being pushed in the US, voters must be on the lookout for AI-generated content that could be used for misinformation.
As the 2024 US presidential election draws near, we’ve rounded up some helpful tips on how voters can tell real content from synthetic ones: